IPA - Aging in a
World of Change - Eighth Congress Jerusalem, August 17-21, 1997
-
IPA Bulletin
Aging in a World of Change - Eighth Congress Jerusalem,
August 17-21, 1997
Leon Flicker
The Congress opened on an informal note with a gathering in the Holiday Inn
Crowne Plaza, where we learned that our meeting coincided with the Israeli
festival of love, the equivalent of St. Valentine’s Day. The only impact
of this occurrence was the inability of delegates to use any of the hotel
pools, as they were in constant use as a backdrop for weddings during this
period!
The scientific program began with the observation that the setting of the
conference in Jerusalem imbued the meeting with a spirituality that was
unsurprising in the birthplace of three of the world's great religions.
The conference organisers, Drs. Belmaker and Davidson, welcomed the
delegates and it was clear that their complementary skills would ensure a
successful meeting.
Professor Raymond Levy astutely announced that he would be unable to
explain the causes of the many difficulties inherent in performing
psychogeriatric research in his brief remarks, and referred the delegates to a
previous editorial on this subject. He then proceeded to have fun and
instructed the delegates to do likewise. Delegates concerned that
Professor Levy would lack direction in his retirement were pleased to learn of
his determination to discover which of the world's great historical figures
actually had fun.
Delegates were then treated by Professor Norman Sartorius to a masterful
exposition of the sociological and human context to many of the problems
confronting those who care for the elderly. The possibility of
increasing generational conflict has never been higher, and the next few years
may see increased pressure on services as older people will have to unite to
maintain adequate facilities for those most impaired.
The papers presented by the three winners of the 1997 IPA/Bayer Research
Awards in Psychogeriatrics covered a broad spectrum of the psychiatric
disorders of old age. They addressed the prediction of
treatment-resistant depression by organic pathology (Steve Simpson), the
association of behavioral disturbance with increased caregiver burden (Michel
Bédard), and the pervasiveness in the very old of the wish to die (Michael
Linden).
An innovation at this conference was provision of sponsored lunches
accompanied by presentations. The first of these outlined the
development of a new cognitive screening instrument. Some in the
audience remained unconvinced of the need for another such screening test,
questioning the potential deleterious effects of widespread screening.
The second presentation dealt with a clinically sensible way of assessing
response to treatment with anticholinesterase inhibitor medications, while the
third dealt with current and future strategies in the pharmacological
treatment of people with Alzheimer's disease.
A fascinating presentation by Copeland and Holmes addressed the interface
between epidemiology and neuropathology. Their message was that
neuropathology coupled with epidemiology provides increasing evidence of mixed
pathology rather than pure forms of dementia, particularly in the oldest
old. This session was complemented by another on frontal lobe dementia,
which revealed the increasing importance of the diagnosis of this condition,
both in neuropathological and clinical terms. In particular, behavioral
management strategies based on neuropsychological abnormalities may be
particularly valuable. It was refreshing to hear health economists
explain the current technical limitations of their science as it applies to
dementia, and the increasing need for basic research before definitive studies
can be performed.
Professor John Breitner maintained the high quality of the plenary lectures
with a fascinating talk on genetics and epidemiology of Alzheimer's
disease. Twin and family studies, in this condition and others, are a
powerful method used to unravel the effects of environmental and genetic
factors. Recent evidence was presented highlighting a wearing off of the
effect of ApoE Î4 with advancing age, perhaps also sex dependent. The
possible beneficial effects of H2 blocking agents and nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs were discussed, although the epidemiological evidence
is not particularly strong yet. The thorny issue of whether Alzheimer’s
disease is a separate condition or represents the end of a continuum with
normal aging was raised in question time; it was agreed that the current level
of disagreement should continue!
A session on advances in cholinergic therapies for the treatment of
Alzheimer's disease heralded the most dramatic change occurring in recent IPA
conferences. There is now abundant evidence that the new
anticholinesterase drugs work for some of the cognitive symptoms of
Alzheimer's Disease. As in most biological systems, different types of
anticholinesterases have been identified, and the potential for tailoring
drugs to inhibit these subtypes was briefly discussed.
The hypothesis of differential effects and side-effects of the
cholinesterase inhibitor drugs versus the muscarinic agonists was also
presented. Although these agents have relatively modest effects, they
represent an exciting new avenue for the active treatment of people with
dementia. A later symposium was again dominated by the development and
evidence of efficacy of the cholinesterase inhibitor drugs.
A session on steroid hormones and CNS in aging also was valuable.
Changes with aging were described in the subtypes of the cytochrome P450
system as well the circadian rhythm of the hypothalmic-pituitary-adrenal
axis. The evidence for the cognitive sparing effect of estrogen was
reviewed systematically and found to be extraordinarily weak considering that
there are many who advocate the use of estrogens in the prevention of
Alzheimer's. This is an area where belief can far outstrip the
availability of evidence.
The Wednesday morning plenary pleased those who believe that dogmatic
assumptions should be investigated by scientific rigor. This time, Dr.
Michael Davidson treated the delegates to an extraordinary exposition on
cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. In many parts of the world there
has been a policy of deinstitutionalisation which, in reality, has been a
process of transinstitutionalisation, effectively mainstreaming the
accommodation of people with psychiatric disability.
Professor Davidson demonstrated evidence that the cognitive decline, in the
order of two points in the MMSE per decade of illness, is probably biological
in nature and unrelated to the sensory deprivation of institutional
settings. Unfortunately, many of the remaining institutionalised
patients are in fact the group who have exhibited the greatest amount of
decline. The neuropathology of this condition is probably not
Alzheimer’s disease in the majority of cases. Professor Folstein then
provided some arguments that many of the symptoms of the agitated patient with
dementia are similar to the diagnostic category of mania and may justify
treatment in this regard.
An experiment with an interactive exercise followed morning tea. The
illustrative case represented a complex management and ethical dilemma in a
man with paranoid delusions and behavioral disturbance. In my view as a
relative outsider (a geriatrician), the most amazing aspect of this exercise
was the degree of concordance expressed in the views of psychogeriatricians
from many countries around the world. I can assure my psychogeriatrician
colleagues the degree of consensus demonstrated was not in keeping with the
view of psychiatrists held by other physicians! Although this was a good
session, I would suggest that such interactives are enhanced by computer touch
screens in the selection of responses, as this minimises the influence of
peers on the interaction process. This is definitely a session that
should be repeated at the next congress, perhaps to a larger audience with
appropriate technical support.
A session on biological markers presented a potpourri of interesting
tidbits, including a report on new process of functional brain imaging using
infrared spectroscopy. Not surprisingly, patients with Alzheimer’s
disease exhibit differences from controls. The findings of increased
DHEA along with elevated cortisol in depressed patients raises questions on
the utility of this hormone in the treatment of depression. A method of
detecting differences in free radical metabolism was presented, as was a study
demonstrating an association between poor vitamin D nutrition, pain, and
impaired cognitive state. Altered zinc metabolism was also found in
patients with Alzheimer's disease, although the pathogenic pathway for this
association remains obscure. The Eighth Congress emphasised the
increased importance of the methods of the new genetics in understanding the
pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Delegates were exposed to reports
of a broad range of studies, including an approach to characterise the
specific phenotype associated with ApoE subtypes and a look at an issue that
is increasingly important about virtually any disease -- whether it is more
appropriate to look for associations with candidate genes, such as ApoE
status, or whether a transgenomic search to identify genomic markers is more
cost-effective. The latter approach has been taken in the UK and would
undoubtedly benefit from international collaboration.
An elegant presentation followed, demonstrating that the known mutations do
not explain the majority of cases of familial Alzheimer’s disease (FAD).
The importance of expert counseling in discussion with the families of people
with FAD was highlighted in another presentation, although the need for
specific clinics for this purpose did not seem justified.
The molecules of Alzheimer's disease were again addressed in the final
plenary session, which succeeded in unifying the major recent molecular
biological findings. The plenary began with a clear exposition of the
present competing theories based on ApoE, Tau, Beta A4, presenilin 1, and
presenilin 2. The possible interaction between these factors was neatly
explained and the possible multiple targets for effective therapies represent
an exciting challenge for the future.
Recently there has been progress in the development of instruments that are
less sensitive to educational and cultural bias. This is an important
area of development, as the risk for dementia may be ameliorated by
environmental factors peculiar to populations that have not adopted a
developed western lifestyle. Only careful prevalence studies coupled
with elucidation of environmental factors will yield results. The
comparison of African Americans with native Africans may be particularly
important, as it represents a wide exposure to environmental factors. A
session on cross-cultural studies highlighted the difficulties of performing
prevalence studies of dementia in populations with limited education.
A presentation on genetic, family, and epidemiological studies highlighted
the difficulty of obtaining adequate family histories for research. In
addition, the potential usefulness of CT and MRI degenerative changes for
selected clinically based research was emphasised. Comparing
psychiatric morbidity and mortality demonstrated again the difficulties of
performing aging research in a cross-sectional manner and underscored the need
for cohort studies spanning extended periods. Interestingly, the last
session on memory clinics around the world highlighted similarities rather
than differences between their practices. There is no doubt that the
imminent availability of effective medications will increase the need for
accurate and specific diagnoses of patients with mild dementia.
In summary, the consistent and general theme of the meeting was that
assessment must be multidisciplinary and include both physical and psychiatric
illness in its scope. The importance of addressing caregiver issues and
the appropriate utilisation of local services were key emphases in all the
clinics.
About the Author
Leon Flicker is a visiting fellow in the Division of Clinical Geratology,
Nuffield Dept. of Clinical Medicine, The Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford,
UK
This article appeared in IPA Bulletin, Volume 14, Number 2
Copyright 2012 International Psychogeriatric Association