“Recent Advances:” Thank You, Robert Baldwin and
Robert Barber
Robert Baldwin and Robert Barber have submitted their last renditions of
“Recent Advances.” This research column in the Research and Practice section of
the IPA Bulletin has been one of the well-received segments of our
publication. I am often reminded (by our members) that “Recent Advances” is the
“most practical” component of the Bulletin. Moreover, our members have
come to rely on this section of the newsletter as a quick way to keep up with
important research findings and noteworthy developments in the field of
Psychogeriatrics.
Bob and Bob (the two Bobs) have tirelessly compiled their articles, issue after
issue. They never seem to disappoint us. The material is always fresh and
timely, and often leads us to the cutting edge of scientific developments in our
field. We are occasionally surprised with some element of controversy, or
excited by the prospect of a new approach to diagnose or treat our patients.
Technologic advances, diagnostic considerations and innovative therapeutic
techniques have been addressed by both of our astute colleagues, time and time
again. In my experience, I have yet to read an issue of “Recent Advances” that
does not provide some new revelation in the field, or validates or repudiates my
own fund of knowledge about a specific line of research.
Thus, I am sad to see our colleagues move on to another chapter in their
professional career. On behalf of the Board of Directors and Past Presidents,
the entire membership and the IPA Secretariat, I thank Robert Barber and Robert
Baldwin for their service to IPA. I wish them all the best in their new
endeavors, and hope that we will occasionally see a submission to the
Bulletin that gives us a glimpse of their ongoing research and professional
activities. I also thank their families for tolerating the time that Bob and Bob
spent over the last several years putting together superb reviews for our
benefit at the IPA Bulletin.
Congratulations and Best Wishes, Bob and Bob. Your insights and keen
perspectives on the literature will be missed.
Reprinted from IPA Bulletin, Volume 27, Number 1
Copyright 2012 International Psychogeriatric Association